Pearlstine, Jules and Pearlstine, Eileen, His Wife v. The United States of America and United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a district court order denying plaintiffs’ motion, filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d), for costs and expenses incurred while seeking to enforce a lease agreement against the United States Postal Service. 1 In order to resolve the controversy, we are called upon to address the following questions: First, whether attorney’s fees are recoverable against the United States and the United States Postal Service in instances alleging vexatious litigation and bad faith; second, whether the district court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Stephen B. Licata v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Henry Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Sheridan v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- IAP, INC. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.