Legal Opinion
IAP, INC. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 30, 1983No. Civ. 79-2649PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIUNNO, Senior District Judge.
This suit, filed August 31,1979, alleges an unlawful combination and conspiracy said to be an unreasonable restraint of trade or commerce in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1) and section 3 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 14).
The suit is a private suit with a right of action arising under sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15 and § 26), with jurisdiction asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1337.
The affidavit of Louis L. Berg, president and principal shareholder of both corporate plaintiffs, sworn to in April, 1982 (and attached…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- The Penwag Property Co., Inc. v. LandauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Henry Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Marchman v. NCNB Texas National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Mozart Co. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Brooks v. State Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1997
- Henry Hudson v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985