Legal Opinion

Lieba, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 15, 1981No. Consolidated Court No. 76-11-02408Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The parties to this action have cross moved for summary judgment under Rule 56. The imported bristles were classified under items 389.60 and 389.62 1 of the Tariff Schedules of the United *343States. Plaintiff maintains the imported bristles are more specifically provided for alternatively under items 186.30, 309.43, 309.90 or 774.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States.

With respect to item 186.30, supra, it is the position of defendant that classification thereunder is precluded as a matter of law since said item is limited to products from animal or vegetable sources, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  3. Arthur J. Humphreys, Packard-Bell Electronics v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. R. H. MacY & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Hawaiian Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API