Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 16, 1991No. ACMR 9002824PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Senior Judge:

A general court-martial convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of making a false official statement with intent to deceive, larceny, submitting a false statement in connection with a claim against the United States, dishonorably failing to pay a debt, violating a lawful general regulation by possessing and using a counterfeit ration control plate, and using and possessing a false military identification card with intent to deceive, in violation of Articles 107, 132, 134, and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907, 932, 934,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. JaramillioU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. YanezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API