Legal Opinion

United States v. Yanez

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 29, 1983No. SPCM 18551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted of two specifications of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886 (1976). His approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for five months and forfeiture of $380.00 pay per month for five months.

During the sentencing hearing, the trial counsel offered a summary court-martial promulgating order as proof of a previous conviction. The defense counsel objected on the ground that the order failed to establish…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Staff Sergeant NORRIS DAVISArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  2. United States v. BakerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API