Legal Opinion

Davis v. Merck Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1949No. Appeal, 209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case with a welter of petitions, answers, etc.,—a record which we will attempt to simplify. The court of common pleas, principally on the theory of res judicata, affirmed the board’s order sustaining the referee’s dismissal of claimant’s petition. Hence this appeal.

The claimant was injured and entered into an agreement for compensation, after which a supplemental agreement was executed November 8, 1944, calling for payments of compensation to December 27, 1944, for the specific loss of the little finger.

On December 19, 1944,—before the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Busi v. A. & S. Wilson Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Harrison v. Alden Park Manor ApartmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Mallory v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Tubbs v. O.T. Oil CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Root v. Dunlop Sons & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holman v. Oriental RefineryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. McGahen v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Rose v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Crimi v. Supreme Clothes, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1961
  5. Rose v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API