Legal Opinion

Blonder v. United Retail Employes, C., No. 108

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 28, 1940Published

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this case was filed for the purpose of restraining the defendants from picketing complainant's place of business at 103 Halsey street, Newark. The defendants are five former employes of the complainant, the union to which they belong, and Brown, the general manager of the union. It developed at the hearing that Brown is no longer the general manager of said union.

Complainant is engaged in the retail shoe business and has been so engaged for over twenty-five years. Sometime in November, 1937, four of his salesmen, Eugene Freund, Daniel Rafaele, Jack Reback and Meyer Fagan, joined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Carlson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. West Allis Foundry Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Van Buskirk v. Sign Painters Local No. 1231Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API