Legal Opinion

Pacific Industries, Inc. v. Singh

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 17, 2003No. 52011-3-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

—Appellant Pacific Industries (PI) appeals a trial court’s decision denying its motion to release a mechanics’ lien and awarding attorney fees to the lien claimant, Respondent Joginder P. Singh. It claims the trial court erred by ruling that the lien was not frivolous when Singh did not have the right to file a lien under chapter 60.04 RCW, the lien was not excessive, and Pi’s motion for reconsideration was filed after the 10-day period allowed under Civil Rule 59 expired. We conclude that although the development services Singh performed are not lienable services under chapter 60.04 RCW, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dean v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. New Castle Investments v. City of LaCenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Blue Diamond Group, Inc. v. KB Seattle 1, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. Northwest Cascade, Inc. v. Unique Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Blue Mountain Plaza, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Shelcon Construction Group, LLC v. HaymondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Williams v. ATHLETIC FIELD, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API