Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Shiplet

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1988No. 87-443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

This contract dispute is appealed to this Court from the Sixth Judicial District, Park County. Ronald Burgess, John Lake and Nick Mallas appeal the judgment of the District Court which treated purchase of land from appellants, under a contract for deed, as a mortgage. The appellants also allege error by the court in failing to award them reasonable attorney fees and damages.

We reverse and remand to the District Court.

The issues presented are as follows:

1. Did the District Court err in treating a contract for deed as an equitable mortgage?

2. Is the anti-forfeiture statute, Section 28-1-104,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glacier Campground v. Wild Rivers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Glacier Campground v. Wild Rivers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Aveco Properties, Inc. v. NicholsonMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Eigeman v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frazer v. Drummond (In Re Frazer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Stark v. BornerMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. SHIPLET v. VenemanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
  4. In Re HenkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1988
  5. Daugherty Cattle Co. v. General Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API