Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
In this case we are asked to determine whether the Supreme Court's decision in Birchfield v. North Dakota , 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (2016), and our decisions in State v. Trahan , 886 N.W.2d 216 (Minn. 2016), and State v. Thompson , 886 N.W.2d 224 (Minn. 2016), announced a new rule of constitutional law that applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. The district courts and the court of appeals concluded that the rule was procedural and not retroactive. Because we conclude that the rule is substantive and retroactive, we reverse.
FACTS
This…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carlos Heard v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Carlos Heard, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Commonwealth v. Olson, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. Olson, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- State of Minnesota v. Isabella Anne GendronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024