Legal Opinion

Koral Industries v. Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1990No. C-9997PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Company, claiming fraudulent inducement and misrepresentation, refused to pay benefits under a key-man life insurance policy when the insured died. The beneficiary, Koral Industries, filed suit for breach of contract. After trial to a jury, Koral was awarded the face value of the policy, damages, statutory penalties, 1 postjudgment interest, and attorney’s fees for trial and appeal. The trial court rendered a take nothing judgment on Security’s counterclaims. The court of appeals reversed and rendered judgment that Koral take nothing on all of its claims…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Trenholm v. RatcliffTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Labbe v. CorbettTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Isenhower v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Koral Industries, Inc. v. Security-Connecticut Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Odom v. Insurance Company of State of Penn.Texas Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Kerrville HRH, Inc. v. City of Kerrville, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
  2. Matis v. Golden, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  3. United States Ex Rel. Wilkins v. North American Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
  4. Douglas v. State Farm LloydsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  5. Kessler v. FanningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API