Legal Opinion · Dissent

Exxon Corp. v. Makofski Ex Rel. Makofski

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 23, 2003No. 14-00-00763-CVPublished

1DissentCharles W. Seymore, Justice

The majority erroneously parses the appellate record and fashions a result by reducing the gatekeeper’s Robinson hearing to a nullity. My colleagues have decided to treat reliability as an evidentiary jury issue; moreover, they misapply appellate rules and case precedent. I dissent.

The Issue is Reliability and the GATEKEEPER IS ESSENTIAL

The issue on appeal is reliability: Exxon contends that plaintiffs’ experts’ opinions1 *192“are not evidence because they are unreliable and founded on unproven assumptions.” The majority reviews the reporter’s record from trial and scientific studies that are not…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API