Exxon Corp. v. Makofski Ex Rel. Makofski
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1DissentCharles W. Seymore, Justice
The majority erroneously parses the appellate record and fashions a result by reducing the gatekeeper’s Robinson hearing to a nullity. My colleagues have decided to treat reliability as an evidentiary jury issue; moreover, they misapply appellate rules and case precedent. I dissent.
The Issue is Reliability and the GATEKEEPER IS ESSENTIAL
The issue on appeal is reliability: Exxon contends that plaintiffs’ experts’ opinions1 *192“are not evidence because they are unreliable and founded on unproven assumptions.” The majority reviews the reporter’s record from trial and scientific studies that are not…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.