Legal Opinion
Maniscalco v. Brother International Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 24, 2011No. Civil Action 3:06-CV-04907 (FLW)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLFSON, District Judge:
Presently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Brother International Corporation (“BIC” or “Defendant”) as well as a Motion to Strike Portions of Defendant’s Reply by Plaintiffs Mark Maniscalco (“Mr. Maniscalco”) and Walter Huryk (“Mr. Huryk”)(collectively “Plaintiffs”). The instant motions arise out of a Complaint by Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves, as well as a putative class of consumers, alleging defects relating to a line of Multi-Function Center (“MFC”) machines distributed by BIC. Specifically, Plaintiffs contend that BIC…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kaucher v. County of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Gray v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Rapid Models & Prototypes, Inc. v. Innovated SolutionsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- County of Santa Clara v. Merck & Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.