Legal Opinion

Clausell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1984No. 83-2522PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

455 So.2d 1050 (1984)

Jose CLAUSELL, Petitioner,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 83-2522.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 13, 1984.

On Motion for Rehearing September 18, 1984.

Pelzner, Schwedock, Finkelstein & Klausner and Robert D. Klausner and Lori E. Barrist, Miami, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

On Motion for Rehearing En Banc September 18, 1984.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

By this petition for writ of certiorari, Jose Clausell asks us to quash an order…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. State v. Del GaudioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  2. State v. NavarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. State v. ClausellSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Meggs v. McClureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Nunez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API