State v. Navarro
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
464 So.2d 137 (1984)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Wilfredo NAVARRO and Roerme Navarro, Appellees.
No. 83-908.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 21, 1984.
On Rehearing February 19, 1985.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Arthur E. Huttoe and John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
On Rehearing En Banc February 19, 1985.
2Per curiam 1
This is an appeal by the State from an order granting a motion to suppress evidence seized from the persons and the automobile of the defendants/appellees.
The…
Also in this document: Dissent · Pearson; Per curiam 2; Dissent · Barkdull; Concurrence · Hendry; Concurrence · Baskin.
3Cases cited18 opinions
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nielsen v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Savoie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Finney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- State v. PyeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Carroll v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.