Legal Opinion

State v. Clausell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 22, 1985No. 65945PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

474 So.2d 1189 (1985)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Jose CLAUSELL, Respondent.

No. 65945.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 22, 1985.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.

Lori E. Barrist of Pelzner, Schwedock, Finkelstein and Klausner, Miami, for respondent.

OVERTON, Justice.

This is a petition to review Clausell v. State, 455 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), in which the Third District Court of Appeal, in an en banc decision, disqualified the office of the state attorney from prosecuting Clausell for perjury because two assistant state attorneys, who…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. John Philip Cerone, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. State v. KollerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. The People v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Downs v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Huggins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API