Legal Opinion

Phillipsen v. Hunt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries received while plaintiff was a patient in the Klamath Valley Hospital, an institution owned and operated by defendant for private gain. The action arose as follows: Drs. Massey and Soule performed a surgical operation upon plaintiff and while she was still unconscious as a result of the general anesthetic removed her from the surgery to a bed prepared for her by nurses in the employ of defendant. The doctors say that before placing her in bed each of them removed a hot water bottle. Dr. Soule is positive that all bottles were removed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Gillilan v. Portland Crematorium Assn.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Coblentz v. JaloffOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Goss v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Francisco v. Circle Tours Sightseeing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. BunceWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Dunning v. Northwestern Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pattle v. WILDISH CONSTRUCTION COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Eldred v. United Amusement Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dittert v. FischerOregon Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API