Francisco v. Circle Tours Sightseeing Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The main question raised upon this appeal is that the trial court instructed the jury on the res ipsa loquitur rule. The defendant contended at the trial, and also at argument, that the rule does not apply, for the reason that the plaintiff alleged in her complaint specific acts of negligence, and did not rely on general negligence. The plaintiff alleges the negligence in the following language:
“That when said automobile was a few miles west of the ‘Columbia Gorge Hotel’ in said county, the defendant carelessly, negligently and recklessly drove said automobile off the said highway and into a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coblentz v. JaloffOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Goss v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by19 opinions
- Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Mares v. New Mexico Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Pickwick Stages Corp. v. MessingerArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Ritchie v. THOMASOregon Supreme Court · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.