Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided July 31, 1974No. CIV-2-74-57PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
By amended complaint, 2 the plaintiff seeks equitable relief by the return of certain firearms and ammunition which were administratively forfeited by the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary) to the United States. The plaintiff appears to undertake to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(a)(1), 1355, 1395(a), and 26 U.S. C. § 7301 et seq. The defendant has moved for a dismissal of the action prior to the amendment on the ground, inter alia, that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Rule 12(b)(1), Federal Rules…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Alfred R. Menkarell v. Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Kroger Company v. Adkins Transfer CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1968
- Epps v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Evelyn Castleberry and Virginia R. Castleberry v. Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division of the Treasury Department of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Elliott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Wood v. Commissioner (In Re Wood)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2005
- Fairchild v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2006
- Hawkins v. Henderson CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998