Legal Opinion

Fidelity Bank of Durham v. Bloomfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1957No. 672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPariceR, J.

The defendant Bloomfield assigns as error the failure of the court to allow his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence. G.S. 1-183. Bloomfield’s contention is that having transferred the lease of 12 September 1951 to the “Peoples Fruit and Pr. Co.” on 1 October 1953, he was from that time relieved from any personal obligation to pay rent.

In Annotation 36 A.L.R. 316, this is written: “It is established by an unbroken line of authority that where a lease containing an express covenant to pay rent has been assigned, the fact that the lessor thereafter accepts rent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Hamlen v. Rednalloh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Park Terrace, Inc. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. S. S. Kresge Co. v. SearsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Coulter v. Capitol Finance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Keels v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Williams v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Kearns v. Gay Apparel Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API