Legal Opinion

Michigan Milk Producers Ass'n v. Commercial Union Insurance

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 6, 1980No. G76-138 CA1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DOUGLAS W. HILLMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michigan Milk Producers Association (hereinafter “MMPA”) brought this diversity action against defendant Commercial Union Insurance Company (hereinafter “CU”) alleging that under Michigan law, excess insurance carriers are liable for a pro-rata share of pre-judgment interest. Jurisdiction is maintained under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Both sides have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, I deny the parties’ motions.

FACTS

Prior to April 6, 1960, an insurance contract with a maximum liability of $50,000.00 was entered into…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Cosby v. PoolMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Wilkerson v. Maryland Cas. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1953
  5. Cottrill v. Michigan Hospital ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Celina Mutual Insurance v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Matich v. Modern Research Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Turner Construction Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Matich v. Modern Research Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Burford Equipment Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API