Legal Opinion

Daniel Grocer Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1971No. 69-143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barr

Upon a jury verdict, by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, Daniel Grocer Company, a corporation, and against defendant, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a corporation, in the amount of $3,649.62 and costs. This appeal followed.

The action is one on a blanket position bond issued by defendant to recover a loss allegedly sustained by plaintiff through fraudulent or dishonest acts committed by one of its employees. Defendants post trial motion was denied except that its renewed motion for a directed verdict against the third-party defendant, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Clarke v. StorchakIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Home Indemnity Co. v. Reynolds & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. Bartlett v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Goldberg v. Capitol Freight Lines, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Central National Life Insurance Company v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, in No. 78-1768, in No. 78-1769 v. Louis K. Risken and C. Ritchey Smiley, Third Party in No. 78-1768, in No. 78-1769Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Reedy Industries, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Central National Life Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  4. J. R. Norton Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Daniel Grocer Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API