J. R. Norton Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Chief Judge.
The primary issue in this case is whether the dishonest act of an employee was causally related to losses sustained by the employer to a degree sufficient to bring it within the terms of a fidelity insurance policy. The appeal grows out of a lawsuit filed by J. R. Norton Company, the employer (referred to as “Norton”) against Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, the insurer (referred to as “Fireman’s Fund”). After Norton had presented its evidence at trial, the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of Fireman’s Fund on the ground that, as a matter of law, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zinnel v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Rovegno v. San Jose Knights of Columbus Hall Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Prior Lake State Bank v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Arlington Trust Co. v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Employer's Administrative Services, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- EMP. ADMIN. SERV. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985