Legal Opinion

United States v. One Juvenile Male

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 23, 1999No. CR 99-59-PAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PANNER, District Judge.

■ D.B., a juvenile male, is charged in a seven-count indictment with shooting two men in separate incidents, killing one. D.B. was seventeen years old when he allegedly committed the crimes and has been treated as a juvenile. The government moves to transfer the juvenile to adult status under 18 U.S.C. § 5032. I deny the government’s motion.

STANDARDS

The district court has discretion to transfer a juvenile defendant to adult status. 18 U.S.C. § 5032; see United States v. Doe, 94 F.3d 532, 536 (9th Cir.1996) (transfer to adult status reviewed for abuse of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Roy Mason AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. E. K.District Court, D. Oregon · 1979
  4. United States v. Gerald N., JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. I.D.P.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Roberto A. Miguel, United States of America v. Bryson JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Roberto A. Miguel, United States of America v. Bryson JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API