Legal Opinion
United States v. Roberto A. Miguel, United States of America v. Bryson Jose
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2003No. 01-10538, 02-10018PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
338 F.3d 995
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roberto A. MIGUEL, Defendant-Appellant.
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bryson Jose, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-10538.
No. 02-10018.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 7, 2003 — Honolulu, Hawaii.
Decided July 23, 2003.
Peter C. Wolff, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant Miguel.
Barry D. Edwards, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellant.
Edward H. Kubo, Jr., Marshall H. Silverberg, and Ronald G. Johnson, United States Attorneys Office, Honolulu, HI, for the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- William H. Fuller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Daniel BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017