Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1910No. Docket No. 55PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Lenawee; O’Mealey, J. Summary proceedings by George H. Nelson and another against Daniel D. Smith for the possession of certain real estate. A judgment for Complainants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
March 17,1908, complainants sold defendant a farm upon contract for a consideration of $1,610, subject to a mortgage of $2,060. One thousand was paid in cash at the time the contract was executed, and the remaining $3,610 was to be paid on December 1,1908. The contract, which was in writing, contained the following provision:
“ It is also agreed by and between the parties hereto that if default shall be made by said party of the second part in any of the payments of principal or interest at the time, or any of the times hereinbefore specified, or in case *364the said party of the second part shall…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maday v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Murphy v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Miner v. DickeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donnelly v. LyonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911