Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of McEwen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was not totally unemployed during the period she was receiving unemployment insurance benefits (see, Matter of Eisenbeil [Hudacs], 187 AD2d 871). Claimant was vice-president and 50% shareholder in an acrylic photograph sculpting business in which she had invested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MurakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of EisenbeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. In re the Claim of FerraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of Cynthia A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. In re VogtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API