Legal Opinion
Hays v. Gilliam
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided May 5, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TODD, Presiding Judge, Middle Section.
The plaintiff, Rogers N. Hays, brought suit against the defendant, James R. Gilliam, for breach of express warranties, implied warranty of habitability, and negligent misrepresentation in the sale of a building containing six one-bedroom apartments. The chancellor found no express warranties existed, but that Gilliam had breached the implied warranty of habitability and awarded Hays damages of $4,250.12. Defendant appealed.
In 1960, a single family dwelling on the property was constructed on the premises. In 1975, the dwelling was destroyed by fire,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Dixon v. Mountain City Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1982
- Pollard v. Saxe & Yolles Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Cooper v. CORDOVA SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
- Belote Ex Rel. Parker v. Memphis Development Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by9 opinions
- Revak v. SEC Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Revak v. SEC Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Adams v. Dean Roofing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Luana Savings Bank v. Pro-Build Holdings, Inc. and United Building CentersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- McClure v. SennstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.