Belote Ex Rel. Parker v. Memphis Development Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
In this case certiorari has heretofore been granted. In granting the certiorari counsel were requested to limit, their argument to answer the question proposed in a memorandum to them as to whether or not the rule as annunciated in Smith v. Tucker, 151 Tenn. 347, 270 S.W. 66, 41 A.L.R. 830, should be modified so as to make the exception as set forth in Restatement of the Law, Torts, Section 353, applicable when the facts meet the test as set forth in this latter exception to the rule. Argument has now been heard, briefs filed, and after much thought and consideration and investigation we are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kilmer v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Willcox v. HinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. TuckerTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Palmore v. Morris, Tasker & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Boyce v. ShankmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
3Cited by17 opinions
- Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Rogers v. ScyphersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Brewer v. Monsanto Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Cooper v. CORDOVA SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
- Gassaway v. Travelers Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.