Legal Opinion

Steele v. Hellar

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1923No. 18176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This action was commenced in the superior court for Mason county by the plaintiff, Steele, against the defendants, "Whitlock, Hellar, and Puget Mills Company, seeking recovery of a personal judgment against Whitlock and Hellar for the rental of a donkey logging engine owned by Steele and used by Whitlock in logging certain timber belonging to Hellar; seeking foreclosure of a lien claim of Steele for the rental of the engine upon logs hauled and moved by Whitlock with it in the logging operations; and seeking, in the alternative of the foreclosure of Steele’s lien claim, in the event the logs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Proulx v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State Bank v. RutheWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. O'Brien v. Perfection Pile Preserving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Overbeck v. CalliganWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Grimm v. Pacific Creosoting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. National Bank of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Delong v. Hi Carbon Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Virden v. NeeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Biegler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  5. Gallatin v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API