Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1993No. 92675, (Calendar No. 10)Published

1DissentLevin, J.

Frederick Robert Rohlman was injured in Ohio in an automobile accident *536while attempting to reconnect a trailer that had become unhitched from the named insured’s minivan in which he had been riding. The questions presented are whether Rohlman

• was an "occupant” of the vehicle within the meaning of no-fault automobile liability act § 3111,1 providing no-fault benefits for out-of-state accidents;

• was "occupying” the vehicle within the meaning of the policy of insurance, which provided — for both no-fault and uninsured motorist purposes — that " '[occupying’ means in, upon, getting in, on, out…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API