Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentLevin, J.
Frederick Robert Rohlman was injured in Ohio in an automobile accident *536while attempting to reconnect a trailer that had become unhitched from the named insured’s minivan in which he had been riding. The questions presented are whether Rohlman
• was an "occupant” of the vehicle within the meaning of no-fault automobile liability act § 3111,1 providing no-fault benefits for out-of-state accidents;
• was "occupying” the vehicle within the meaning of the policy of insurance, which provided — for both no-fault and uninsured motorist purposes — that " '[occupying’ means in, upon, getting in, on, out…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Tata v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Miller v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.