Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Trafford

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1983No. 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Appellant Mark Trafford was found guilty, following a non-jury trial, of arson, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3301(b). Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to two years probation and ordered to pay the costs of prosecution and make restitution for damages. The only claim raised on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. We agree and therefore reverse the judgment of sentence.

In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence after a guilty verdict, the evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to the Commonwealth, and the Commonwealth…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. ClintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. GarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API