Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scott

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1991No. 3151PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment of sentence imposed following a non-jury verdict of guilty on one count of arson and one count of risking catastrophe. Appellant, Linda Scott, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence upon which her convictions are based. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Therefore, we reverse.

We preface our discussion by emphasizing that we are fully cognizant of the narrow standard of review by which this court must judge sufficiency claims. The established test is whether, viewing all the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SwerdlowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. UrrutiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. MatthewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Com. v. Spence, O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API