Commonwealth v. Ford
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence entered . after appellant was convicted of arson endangering persons and arson endangering property. Appellant raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions; (2) whether the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial when a Commonwealth witness testified that appellant had previously been charged *473with an unrelated act of arson; (3) whether the trial court erred in allowing the Commonwealth to reopen its case to present testimony to refute appellant’s alibi without proper…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GallowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. PerdueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Com. v. Antidormi, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Lee, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Maddox, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Mahmud, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Pasqualichio, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.