Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ford

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1992No. 00043PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence entered . after appellant was convicted of arson endangering persons and arson endangering property. Appellant raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions; (2) whether the trial court erred in failing to declare a mistrial when a Commonwealth witness testified that appellant had previously been charged *473with an unrelated act of arson; (3) whether the trial court erred in allowing the Commonwealth to reopen its case to present testimony to refute appellant’s alibi without proper…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HardcastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. GallowaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. PerdueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Com. v. Antidormi, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Lee, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Maddox, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Mahmud, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Pasqualichio, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API