Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United American Lines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 22, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion to set aside the summons and cross-complaint served upon Row & Davis Engineers, Inc., doing business as Davis Engineering Corporation, hereafter referred to as Davis Engineering Corporation. The original action was instituted on April 17, 1924, by the service of a summons and complaint by the plaintiff on the defendant United American Lines, Ine.

On February 39, 1927, a motion was granted upon default, allowing a supplemental summons and eross-eomplaint to be served by the defendant United American Lines, Inc., upon the Davis Engineering Corporation,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bozzuffi v. DarrieusecqAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
  2. Otis Elevator Co. v. MillerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tullgren v. JasperDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939
  2. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
  3. Lowry & Co. v. National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  4. Schotis v. North Coast Stevedoring Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
  5. Sperry v. Keeler Transportation Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API