Legal Opinion

Sperry v. Keeler Transportation Line, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 27, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

Motion of the defendant, Keeler Transportation Line, Inc., to bring in Whitney & Kemmerer, Inc., as a defendant in this action, and allow a supplemental summons and pleading, alleging the claim of the defendant Keeler Transportation, Inc., against the proposed defendant, be served upon it, in order that the claim of the Keeler Transportation Lane, Inc., against Whitney & Kemmerer, Inc., may also be determined in this action.

The motion is made under section 193, subd. 2, of the Civil Practice Act of the state of New York, which reads as follows:

“Where any party to an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowry & Co. v. National City BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  2. Wilson v. United American Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tullgren v. JasperDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1939
  2. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
  3. Franklin v. Meredith Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Aberha v. Director Nevada Dept of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API