Legal Opinion

Sac City Canning Co. v. Griffin Grocery Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1924No. 13697PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 5. Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Hal Johnson, Assigned Judge. Action by the Sac City Canning Company, a corporation, against the Griffin Grocery Company, a corporation, for the recovery of $2,250 and interest and costs upon a written contract. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Pittsburg county, Okla., by the Sac City Canning Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the Griffin Grocery Company, a corporation, defendant in error, defendant below, to recover the sum of $2,250, and interest from the 31st day of December, 1920, at the rate of six per cent, per annum until paid, and for costs, upon a written contract.

The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the lower court.

Plaintiff is a foreign corporation and the defendant is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kingfisher Mill & Elev. Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Rider v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Still v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Tecumseh BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Mirzaie v. Smith Cogeneration, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Downing v. First Bank in ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. GillamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. Fisher Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API