Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. Gillam
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 8, 1927No. 16724PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, C.
This was a controversy over the proceeds derived from the sale under foreclosure of certain personal property in which both parties claimed rights as mortgagees.
The plaintiff in error was defendant and defendant in error was plaintiff in the court below. For convenience the plaintiff in error occasionally will be referred to in this opinion as “the bank.”
The basic disputed point is the construction of the mortgages held by the bank; that is, the construction as to the obligation secured by the two chattel mortgages, one original and the other a renewal, under which the bank claims the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Brick v. BrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Torrance v. McDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- First National Bank in Dallas, a National Banking Association, and Cross-Appellee v. F. McQueen Rozelle, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. Home Builders Ass'n of RealtorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Kamaole Resort Twenty-One v. Ficke Hawaiian Investments, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- Johnston v. American Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- First National Bank, Cortez v. First Interstate Bank, Riverton, N.A.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.