Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Tecumseh Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 1988No. 61928PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Chief Justice.

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether this court should extend the implied-in-law duty of good faith and fair dealing, now imposed upon contracts of insurance, to contracts for commercial loans in order to support a cause of action for “tortious breach of contract.” Other issues argued on appeal are the propriety of summary judgment and whether the facts support a cause of action for breath of the express terms of a written contract.

The facts of this case are as follows: Douglas E. Rodgers, Jane B. Rodgers, Don C. Croka, and Jeanne Carpenter Croka…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. McCorkle v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Roach v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API