Legal Opinion

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Santo Arrieta, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2006No. 04-2350, 05-2010PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.

The conviction in this case turns on whether a road maintained by Sante Fe County, New Mexico, lying between two parcels of land owned by non-Indians but within the exterior boundaries of the Poj-oaque Pueblo, where the Pueblo’s title has not been extinguished by Congress, is “I n-dian country” for purpose of the exercise of federal criminal jurisdiction.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

As a result of an altercation in January 2000, a federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Defendant-Appellant Santo Arrieta 1 for committing an assault against an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal GovernmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Manzanares v. HigdonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. MytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API