Legal Opinion

Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 2009No. 07-9506PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Hydro Resources, Inc. (“HRI”) challenges a February 6, 2007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Land Status Determination, in which EPA concluded that certain land owned by HRI in the “checkerboard” area of northwestern New Mexico—the so-called “Section 8” land—is “Indian country.” EPA’s Determination subjects HRI’s proposed uranium mine to EPA regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 300f-300j(26), rather than regulation by the New Mexico Environmental Department (“NMED”).

EPA’s regulations implementing the SDWA define Indian…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Hydro Resources, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Garcia v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. The QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA v. Blue Tee Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
  5. State v. VandeverNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API