Legal Opinion

State v. Sigfridson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 2017No. 14CR1900FE; A160192PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, J. pro tempore

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on one count of possession of heroin, ORS 475.854, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence—a syringe, a “cooker,” and a small plastic baggie and its contents—that was discovered by a sheriffs deputy while taking defendant into custody on a probation violation. The trial court ruled that the items were discovered as the result of questioning that violated defendant’s Miranda rights, but it concluded that the evidence inevitably would have been discovered as part of a search incident…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. VondehnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. MazzolaOregon Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CoopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API