Legal Opinion

Jeter v. Goughenour

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the District Court of Hartley. Tried below before Hon. Ira Webster.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

Defendant in error brought this suit to recover from plaintiff in error the office of county judge of Moore County, and also damages for the loss of the fees of office collected and appropriated by plaintiff in error. Both issues were submitted to the jury and disposed of as follows: “We, the jury, find that no vacancy existed in the office of county judge of Moore County, Texas, and therefore find for plaintiff, with fees or salary.” Judgment was entered on this verdict for the office and costs of suit, but without making any mention of the clause “with fees or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Canter v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Prouty v. MusquizTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Watkins v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Roberts v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gregory v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Griffith v. State Ex Rel. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API