Legal Opinion

Griffith v. State Ex Rel. Ainsworth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1920No. 1146PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarper, C. J.

This is an action in quo warranto instituted by the district attorney of the Eighty-Third district of Texas, upon relation of L. W. Ainsworth, to remove appellant, H. B. Griffith, from the office of county judge of Upton county, Tex., and for-the emoluments of the office. Petition signed by both the district attorney and attorney for appellee. Tried to a jury, and upon the verdict the court entered its judgment that L. W. Ainsworth recover of H. B. Griffith title and possession of the office, and further decreed that “Ainsworth take nothing upon his suit for salary, fees, or emoluments.”

From…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McWhorter v. NorthcutTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jeter v. GoughenourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  2. Hand v. State ex rel. YelkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. David Crawford, Potter County Constable, Precinct 3 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  4. David Crawford, Potter County Constable, Precinct 3 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. David Crawford, Potter County Constable, Precinct 3 v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API