Legal Opinion

United States v. Ridley

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 21, 1986No. ACM S26246 (f rev)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*698DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

2Per curiam

After our original decision in this case, United States v. Ridley, 18 M.J. 806 (A.F.C.M.R.1984), set aside the appellant’s conviction because of a jurisdictional flaw, i.e., the accuser outranked the convening authority, The Judge Adyocate General of the Air Force filed a certificate of review with the United States Court of Military Appeals who determined that although the convening authority was disqualified to convene the appellant’s trial, such disqualification was not jurisdictional. United States v. Ridley, 22 M.J. 43 (C.M.A.1986). Accordingly, the record of…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. JeffersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. RidleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BarnardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. BurgeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. United States v. RiosU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API