United States v. Ridley
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
*698DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
2Per curiam
After our original decision in this case, United States v. Ridley, 18 M.J. 806 (A.F.C.M.R.1984), set aside the appellant’s conviction because of a jurisdictional flaw, i.e., the accuser outranked the convening authority, The Judge Adyocate General of the Air Force filed a certificate of review with the United States Court of Military Appeals who determined that although the convening authority was disqualified to convene the appellant’s trial, such disqualification was not jurisdictional. United States v. Ridley, 22 M.J. 43 (C.M.A.1986). Accordingly, the record of…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. JeffersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. RidleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BarnardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BurgeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. RiosU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987