Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ridley

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 14, 1986No. 50639; ACM S26246PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

The accused, who was assigned to the Air Force Office of Scientific Research *44(AFOSR), was charged by his commander, Colonel James E. Baker, with possessing and using marihuana and soliciting another to distribute it, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The charges were referred for trial by a special court-martial convened by Colonel Edward R. Maney, commander of the 1100th Air Base Wing, Bolling Air Force Base, where AFOSR was a tenant unit. Colonel Baker, who preferred the charges himself and so was the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BlaylockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. FergusonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. CrossleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. LaGrangeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  4. United States v. JeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. LewisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API