Legal Opinion

McQuillan v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1896No. 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.— Hon. Bichard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*601The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

This action was brought to recover for injuries sustained from a fall through a defective sidewalk, and the case comes to this court for the second time. On the first appeal this court reversed the order of the lower court sustaining a non-suit. McQuillan v. Seattle, 10 Wash. 464 (38 Pac. 1119). Upon the trial which followed, the respondent recovered a verdict for $1,000, and, its motion for a new trial having been overruled and judgment entered upon the verdict, the city has appealed.

The errors assigned are: (1) Failure to grant a non-suit;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Duggan v. Pacific Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Box v. KelsoWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Seattle Gas & Electric Light & Motor Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Port Blakely Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Duteau v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Carstens v. EarlesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. DouetteWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing v. ZollarsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API