Seattle Gas & Electric Light & Motor Co. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, C. J.
In this case it is strenuously insisted that the verdict of the jury is against the evidence. A large claim for damages is made, and the jury found that no damages had been sustained. The testimony is exceedingly voluminous, but we have thoroughly examined it in detail, and from such examination, especially considering the fact that the jury examined the premises and the property alleged to be damaged, we do not think the testimony presents that undisputed proof of damages which would justify this court in disturbing the verdict of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Roberts v. Port Blakely Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Carstens v. EarlesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Johnson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Wiles v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Cheichi v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.