Legal Opinion
Laborers' Combined Funds of Western Pennsylvania v. Molinaro Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 2017No. 2:15cv1456; 2:15cv1455PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
David Stewart Cercone, United States District Judge
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs, Laborers’ Combined Funds of Western Pennsylvania (“Laborer Funds”) and Board of Trustees of the Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. (“Bricklayer Funds”) (collectively “Funds” or “Plaintiffs”), instituted these related actions against Defendants, Molinaro Corporation (“Molinaro”) and Anthony Leone (“Leone”) (collectively “Defendants”), to recover fringe benefits and wage deductions Defendants allegedly were required to contribute to the Funds for the period from February 2015…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- McGreevy v. StroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Shonberger v. OswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- I.U.P.A.T. DISTRICT COUNCIL57 COMBINED FUNDS v. BarlowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- I.U.P.A.T. District Council No. 57 Combined Funds v. HawrankoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- I.U.P.A.T. District Council No. 57 Combined Funds v. RoetterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021