STATE OF MICHIGAN v. McQUEEN
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.
In this public nuisance action, we must determine whether defendants’ business, which facilitates patient-to-patient sales of marijuana, operates in accordance with the provisions of the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (MMMA).1 We hold that it does not and that, as a result, the Court of Appeals reached the correct result when it ordered that defendants’ business be enjoined as a public nuisance.
The MMMA authorizes “[t]he medical use of marihuana ... to the extent that it is carried out in accor*141dance with the provisions of [the] act.”2 Section 3(e) of the act defines “medical use” broadly to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Ter Beek v. City of WyomingMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- People of Michigan v. Robert TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- S. Dearborn Envtl. Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. QualityMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. MazurMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. KoonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.